Governance of a City-State
[The Angle] Social media’s role in Dr Chee’s comeback

 

The “Dr Chee factor” – that is, the resurgence and embrace of Singapore Democratic Party leader Chee Soon Juan (CSJ) as a candidate to vote for – has been one of the surprises of this year’s general election.

A large part of it is a result of social media. 

Social media has enabled many people to watch the video by filmmaker Tay Bee Pin of CSJ, his wife Dr Huang Chihmei and their three children. This short video has gone viral with over 255,000 views on Tay’s YouTube channel, as of 8 September. The comments left by viewers are largely supportive.

The video, as suggested by its title “Behind The Man”, shows Dr Chee as a father and husband and portrays his personal values and interests. It humanises him. In the past before the era of social media and against the backdrop of a compliant mainstream media, it was difficult for him to channel these aspects of himself – or any other sympathetic messages – directly to people and for them to share it quickly and widely with others.

Dr Chee himself referred to this unprecedented power of social media in an interview last week. 

A journalist wrote to me for comments, asking if Dr Chee’s present appeal comes from him being a “changed man”, with “a style these days that is said to be very different from the combative or confrontational approach he used to adopt”.

This is difficult to answer.

In the past, few people saw Dr Chee in person or through media created by his party or supporters, so most people learned about him through the filtered lens of a mainstream media with largely only one perspective. Now with social media, Singaporeans can see him directly or through portrayals by more sympathetic eyes.

Did he then really use to adopt a “combative or confrontational approach”? It is difficult to judge if he is now a “changed man” because we do not know what the original man was like. In the same interview mentioned above, Dr Chee, who last contested in 2001 and was discharged from bankruptcy three years ago, replied to a question about this: “What’s changed is the perception of me, and how that has come about is the advent of social media. Before that, the media could paint anything (they) wanted about me, and that was very difficult for me to counter. With the opening up of new media, perceptions have begun to change.”

With new media, many young people who did not know and perhaps do not care about how he was portrayed in the past now judge Dr Chee by what he says now and how he says it (because voting, like other human decisions, is both a rational and emotional choice, as it ought to be).

It could also be that their yardstick of what is combative or confrontational is different from that of the previous generation. For some older voters, the damage to Dr Chee’s reputation is permanent, but others who would not have voted for him in the past are saying that they would now give him a chance for his resilience and performance at the rallies, based on videos which can be watched via social media.

A video of Dr Chee speaking at the 3 September rally at Choa Chu Kang stadium garnered over 180,000 views in four days, in one YouTube channel alone.

Tan Tarn How is a Senior Research Fellow at IPS. View his profile here

Top photo from the SDP Facebook page.

You may Also Like

Governance of a City-State
[The Angle] GE2015 – a measure of what’s been said, and done
There may be global economic and geopolitical uncertainties to take into account this coming GE but many will argue that it is the local that really shapes the vote. What might the local and national considerations be? From our IPS Survey of GE2011, the top national issues our respondents said shaped their votes then were “having […]
Read More
Governance of a City-State
[The Angle] Age, class and the General Election
There are four factors that can matter in any election in Singapore. They are race, religion, age and class. My own sense is that race and religion could have mattered, but they do not. That is indeed a blessing as they can be rather explosive, if not handled well. But given that there are adequate […]
Read More
Governance of a City-State
[The Angle] GE2015: Why Release Sample Count Results?
On 2 September, the Elections Department of Singapore (ELD) announced that it would make public the results of the sample counts for all constituencies soon after the close of polling stations on Polling Day (8 pm on 11 September). As such, instead of having to wait past midnight for election results to be announced, Singaporeans will […]
Read More
Governance of a City-State
[The Angle] Insights from GE2011: Does the Internet help increase voters’ political knowledge?
During the current election, voters who read the mainstream media will often find that it tells a consistently different story about facts, events and issues from alternative media websites such as The Online Citizen. Some have dismissed the Internet – or at least alternative websites – as an irrational space that confuses people. Others have […]
Read More
Governance of a City-State
[The Angle] Insights from GE2011: Political discussion during elections in Singapore
In Singapore elections — as elsewhere — people form political opinions including views about parties and whom to vote for based on what they read in the media, what they hear at rallies and what they discuss with others. The emergence of new media such as the Internet and mobile phones has led to more […]
Read More
Governance of a City-State
[The Angle] Insights from GE2011: Youths, media and voting during the elections
A lot of discussion in the upcoming election has centred on youths and how they will vote in the coming election. Other questions on how they use different media, particularly online media, and whether there is a generation gap between them and the older voters. For the 2011 election, Assistant Professor Trisha T. C. Lin […]
Read More

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to our mailing list to get updated with our latest articles!